Essay
Archive for April, 2006
Humour
Net neutrality amendment fails
Great Ape Project traction in Spain
Animal Rights
Indian lit cuteness wears off
Books
Asexuality as an orientation
On what unites us in populist struggle
Activism
Human Rights
Pomo
Solidarity
A bicycle is not enough
Biology
Evo Psychology
Reductionism
Rants
The spectre of Malthus
Arrogance
East vs West
Economics
Scientism
Mozilla makes money?
Open Source
Plato’s Beard » 2006 » April
Plato’s Beard » 2006 » April
On many left lists, in the West in particular, if you talk about the unsustainability of current human population and consumption, you are often labelled a "neo-Malthusean" and further, an enemy of the common folks and an advocate of population control of the worst kind. A popular modern version of this debate is the Simon-Ehrlich wager, between conservative economist Simon and eco-activistic (and in that sense leftist) biologist Ehrlich; the twist being that it is the conservative who argues against any dangers posed by human population. For the record, Ehrlich lost that wager handily.
Ehrlich offered a newer list of criteria that Simon found unnacceptable (see link above). What is interesting about the new list is that Ehrlich finally starts thinking outside the [human] consumption trap (and the rephrasing of the issue as one of the effects of human consumption).
Recently, biologist Eric Pianka, at the University of Texas, has been in hot water over his own doomsday predictions about disease and death among human populations. I do not know the background of this guy and his affiliations. However, the following note from his website is an excellent argument of why human arrogance and ignorance, in this context, are morally repugnant.
While he may be temporarily (or even entirely) wrong on the predictions about disease, he is (IMHO) absolutely right on human crowding out of other species, human faith on technology, and in particular our attitude towards the world and how we "consume" it. It is fashionable today (within the left) to dismiss this sort of thing as "new age" sentimentality or "primitivism". The argument deserves more respect.